Home | Interns | Get Involved | Contribute | Prayer Request | Executive Board | History of Christianity | Interfaith Initiatives | Media | Membership | Contact Us
• Call for end to caste discrimination, even within churches     • Five sentenced to life for killing pastor during Orissa mayhem     • India slams US body's criticism on religious freedom     • No violence reported as Hindu groups observe Saraswati death anniversary     • Karnataka: Police sides with extremists, arrests eight pastors     • US panel puts India on watch list     • Prime Minister defines 'religion' at Communal Harmony Awards function     • I am sorry: PC tells Kandhamal riot victims     • USCIRF regrets being denied visas to India     • Minorities commission wants extension of CRPF forces in Kandhamal     Search:
 
Daily Thought
"The only thing necessary for the triumph of evil is for good men to do nothing" - Edmund Burke
 
 
Click here to print    Click here to Send this
SC lifts stay on trial of Gujarat riots cases
Published : May 1, 2009

 Sedhuraman
Legal Correspondent

Apex court gets cracking

  • RK RaghavanDirects setting up of six fast-tracks courts for completing the proceedings on a day-to-day basis
  • Rejects NHRC's demand for shifting the trial cases out of Gujarat
  • Asks SIT to continue its probe and make recommendations on the security of witnesses
  • Gives SIT final say in appointing public prosecutors and seeking their replacement

New Delhi, May 1
Vacating the over five-year-long stay on the trial of the cases relating to the 2002 Godhra train fire and the subsequent riots in Gujarat, the Supreme Court today ordered the setting up of six designated fast-track courts to complete the proceedings on a day-to-day basis.

In a 42-page judgment, a three-member Bench headed by Justice Arijit Pasayat, however, rejected National Human Rights Commission's (NHRC) demand for shifting the trial out of Gujarat.

“The conduct of the trials has to be resumed on a day-to-day basis, keeping in view the fact that the incidents are of January 2002 and the trials already stand delayed by seven years. The need for early completion of sensitive cases more particularly in cases involving communal disturbances cannot be overstated,” Justice Pasayat, who wrote the judgment for the Bench, said.

Supplementary charge sheets should be filed as the apex court-appointed Special Investigation Team (SIT), headed by former CBI Director RK Raghavan, had found further material and identified other accused against whom charges were now to be brought, said the Bench, which included Justices P Sathasivam and Aftab Alam.

The SC had stayed the trial on November 21, 2003 following complaints of tardy investigation and that several accused were not booked. Subsequently, the court had set up the SIT to conduct further probe and file status reports periodically.

The SIT would continue its investigation and make its recommendations for the protection of witnesses, including their relocation outside Gujarat, if need be. The Union Home Ministry would make arrangements for the relocation.

Considering the nature and “sensitivity” of these cases and the history of the entire litigation, “senior judicial officers” should be appointed by the Gujarat HC Chief Justice to conduct the trials, the Bench said.

The SIT would have the final say in the appointment of public prosecutors (PPs) and the right to seek their replacements or the appointment of additional PPs, if necessary. It would also submit quarterly reports to the apex court in “sealed covers” so that the trials were smooth and satisfactory.

Referring to an apprehension that unruly situations might be created in the court to “terrorise” witnesses, the Bench said the trial court concerned would deal with such developments “sternly” and pass necessary orders. “The role of the victim in a criminal trial can never be lost sight of. He or she is an inseparable stakeholder in the adjudicating process.”

Three of the designated courts would be set up at Ahmedabad, including one at Sabarmati Jail, for holding trial in the Godhra train tragedy case

More in NEWS REPORTS
  • Bajrang Dal: The militant face of the saffron family?
  • Jealousy has prompted attacks: Christian priest
  • Amend Article 355, Cong minister writes to PM
  • Advani condemns attacks, calls for inter-religious talks
  • Kandhmal violence: Tribals to join peace talks
  • Universal Declaration of Human Rights
    Constitution of India - Fundamental rights
     
    Is it right for Saginaw Valley State University to honor Chief Minister Mr. B. S. Yeddyurappa the persecutor of innocent Christians in India ?.
         Yes
         No
         Can't Say

    E-mail Blogged Search
     
    Prayer Request | Executive Board | Press Releases | News Reports | History of Christianity | Interfaith Initiatives | Media | Membership | Articles | Human Rights | Human Rights | Canada Chapter
    © Copyright 2008-09 all rights reserved